Nov 15, 2002 - [1] We have constructed new apparent polar wander paths (APWPs) for major plates over the last 200 Myr. Updated kinematic models. 24 Free Unicode Korean Fonts. Most Popular - By Name 바탕 Batang Font 굴림 Gulim Font 궁서 Gungsuh Font 백묵 헤드라인 Baekmuk Headline Font 돋움.

Contents • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • History of Islam, not the History of Muslim Societies [ ] This article is not a history of Islam at all; it is a history of Muslim societies. Where is a history of the evolution of religious practice, of philosophical interpretations of the Quran, of cross-cultural influences on Islam? Despite what Orientalists or certain fundamentalists might have you believe, Muslims do not live by religion alone, and Islam is not unchanging. It has a history. The evolution of Islamic law, the rise of Sufism and other topics might seem arcane, but they are of overwhelming importance. There needs to be a single article which summarizes these and other developments.

22:21, 10 August 2007 (UTC) What you say here makes sense. Le torrent anne hebert pdf converter. So we should have another topic on History of Islam - () 12:56, 12 May 2008 (UTC) I agree. Present article is more a history of Muslim rulers, conquests and kingdoms! 12:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC) I strongly suggest to revert title to 'History of Islam' rather than 'Muslim History'.

A muslim is one person, while Islam is a nation. And since you are talking about history of the nation, it will be much more appropriate to call it 'History of Islam'. -- () 08:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC) I will reiterate: this is NOT a history of Islam, so far. Until it actually becomes a History Of Islam, its title should reflect its actual content. So far, it is a History of the Succession of Political Power in Parts of the Islamic World Written from an Extremely Biased Viewpoint of One Who is Obviously Shi'ite and Who Chooses to Present Only those Facts and Comments that Support His Chosen Prejudice.

To leave this titled 'History of Islam' is a horrible slander against Islam and, clearly, most of its adherents throughout the last 1400+ years. - —Preceding comment added 15:15, 27 February 2013 (UTC) Suggestions for Changes, 2004 [ ] Sections 5-17 (except 12.1) are completely off topic. This article is titled 'History of Islam'. Islam as a religious belief has changed very little since its inception, and the mention of anything dated after the second Fitna is a dead giveaway that the writers of this article are idiots. -20721 — The preceding comment was added by ( • ) 7 Sept 2005. I'm not sure where, but it seems like a history of Islam should mention the Qur'an and Haddith somewhere. For example, how does the Qur'an fit into the timeline of Muslim history?

It could be right in the table of contents somewhere. The first sentence is not quite true. Hot licks bugs. The Meccans were settled arabs. Also, the part on the Shiite-Sunnite controversions should be moved out of the article, but I don't know where.